August 25, 2022
2 min read
[xyz-ips snippet=”Output-Source-Name”]
[ad_1]
August 25, 2022
2 min read
Disclosures:
The researchers report no relevant financial disclosures. Barrett-Campbell, DeGroote and Lansigan report no relevant financial disclosures.
ADD TOPIC TO EMAIL ALERTS
Receive an email when new articles are posted on
Fewer than half of breast cancer studies in the National Cancer Database reported Hispanic ethnicity and about one-third categorized race and ethnicity into mutually exclusive groups, according to study results.
The findings, published in JAMA Oncology, additionally showed that less than 1% of studies disaggregated ethnoracial categories for Hispanic and non-Hispanic individuals.

Hispanic individuals comprise 18.7% of the U.S. population and represent the fastest growing demographic in the U.S., according to U.S. Census Bureau data.
“Despite this, the inclusion of Hispanic ethnicity as a covariate in studies is inconsistent, and disaggregation of Hispanic ethnicity by race is infrequent,” Jose G. Bazan, MD, MS, radiation oncologist in the department of radiation oncology at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, and colleagues wrote. “For patients with breast cancer, studies suggest that there are ethnoracial (eg, Hispanic-Black, Hispanic-white) differences in stage, treatment and mortality.”
Bazan and colleagues sought to characterize the inclusion of Hispanic ethnicity or ethnoracial categories in 361 breast cancer studies with a median sample size of 68,242 patients included in the National Cancer Database between 2010 and 2021.
Results showed 36% of studies reported mutually exclusive race and ethnicity groups, including Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic white, in the patient demographics, and 32% of studies reported them in the results. Moreover, only two studies disaggregated Hispanic ethnicity by race.
Reporting of ethnicity occurred less frequently compared with race in the patient demographics (47% vs. 87%), the results (42% vs. 80%) and both the patient demographics and results (41% vs. 79%) of studies, and was more likely to not be reported in either the patient demographics or results (52% vs. 12%).
“These results are meaningful when contextualized within the race and ethnicity reporting guidance from JAMA,” Bazan and colleagues wrote.
“Future studies should categorize patients by both race and ethnicity and report country of origin when available,” they continued. “The inclusion of distinct ethnoracial categories will further improve the understanding of the influence of ethnoracial differences in experiences of systemic inequity, structural racism, and discrimination, as well as their effects on breast cancer outcomes.”
Racism in biomedical research contributes substantially to race-based medicine, according to an accompanying viewpoint by Odeth Barrett-Campbell, MD, hematologist-oncologist at Dartmouth Cancer Center, Maya DeGroote, MD, primary care physician at Contra Costa Family Medicine Residency in California, and Frederick Lansigan, MD, interim associate dean of diversity, equity and inclusion at Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center.
“Race is a social power construct that has been wrongly used as a proxy for genetic variation despite demonstrated genetic heterogeneity within racial groups,” they wrote. “It is critical to assess how race and ethnicity are categorized and used in cancer research. To mitigate health inequities, cancer studies should use ‘race-conscious medicine’ that ‘emphasizes [structural] racism, rather than race, as a key determinant of illness and health.’”
ADD TOPIC TO EMAIL ALERTS
Receive an email when new articles are posted on

[ad_2]
Source link
Download and distribute powerful vaccination QI resources for your community.
Sign up now to support health equity and sustainable health outcomes in your community.
MCED tests use a simple blood draw to screen for many kinds of cancer at once.
FYHN is a bridge connecting health information providers to BIPOC communities in a trusted environment.
Discover an honest look at our Medicare system.
ARC was launched to create a network of community clinicians to diversify and bring clinical trials to communities of color and other communities that have been underrepresented.
The single most important purpose of our healthcare system is to reduce patient risk for an acute event.
[xyz-ips snippet=”Output-Source-Name”]